The researchers trained the algorithm on images from 121 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle-biopsy with subsequent molecular testing. From 134 total lesions, 43 nodules were classified as high risk and 91 were classified as low risk, based on a panel of genes used in the molecular testing. A preliminary set of images with known risk classifications was used to train the model or algorithm. From this bank of labeled images, the algorithm utilized machine-learning technology to pick out patterns associated with high and low risk nodules, respectively. It used these patterns to form its own set of internal parameters that could be used to sort future sets of images; it essentially “trained” itself on this new task. Then the investigators tested the trained model on a different set of unlabeled images to see how closely it could classify high and low genetic risk nodules, compared to molecular tests results.
“Machine learning is a low-cost and efficient tool that could help physicians arrive to a quicker decision as to how to approach an indeterminate nodule,” says John Eisenbrey, PhD, associate professor of radiology and lead author of the study. “No one has used machine learning in the field of genetic risk stratification of thyroid nodule ultrasound.”
The researchers found that their algorithm performed with 97% specificity and 90% predictive positive value, meaning that 97% of patients who truly have benign nodules will have their ultrasound read as “benign” by the algorithm, and 90% of malignant or “positive” nodules are truly positive as classified by the algorithm . The high specificity is indicative of a low rate of false positives; this means that if the algorithm reads a nodule as “malignant” it is very likely to truly be malignant. The overall accuracy of the algorithm was 77.4%.
“This was such an important collaboration of surgeons and radiologists, and there’s already interest from other institutions to pool our resources. The more data we feed the algorithm, the stronger and more predictive we’d expect it to become,” says Dr. Cottril.
“There are so many potential applications of machine learning,” says Dr. Eisenbrey. “In the future we’d like to make use of feature extraction, which will help us identify anatomically relevant features of high risk nodules.”
Though preliminary, the study suggests that automated machine learning shows promise as an additional diagnostic tool that could improve the efficiency of thyroid cancer diagnoses. Once it becomes more robust, the approach could give doctors and patients more information in order to decide if thyroid lobe removal is necessary.
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Article Reference: Kelly Daniels, Sriharsha Gummadi, Ziyin Zhu, Shuo Wang, Jena Patel, Brian Swendseid, Andrej Lyshchik, Joseph Curry, Elizabeth Cottrill, John Eisenbrey, “Machine-Learning for the Genetic Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules by Ultrasound”, DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2019.3073, JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg., 2019.
By Karuna Meda
Media Contacts: Karuna Meda, 267-624-4792, karuna.meda@jefferson.edu; Edyta Zielinska, 215-955-7359, edyta.zielinska@jefferson.edu.